What if a handful of Chinese footnotes held the key to the first Indian priests who came to Cambodia by sea? Paul Pelliot’s classic study quietly redraws the ancient map of Southeast Asia.
In this classic 1925 article, first published in the Études asiatiques, Paul Pelliot gathers and comments on a series of Chinese textual fragments dealing with “Indianized Indochina”, with a particular focus on the kingdom of Funan and the maritime networks of Southeast Asia. The modern reprint co‑published by Hachette Livre and the Bibliothèque Nationale de France, based on Gallica’s digitized collections, brings this foundational piece of scholarship back into easy reach as a heritage edition.
Pelliot explicitly situates his study within the continuity of his earlier work in historical geography, while noting that archaeological discoveries and the research of Coedès and Ferrand have significantly reshaped the field. His stated aim is modest but precise: to present “a few rather brief texts” which, without claiming to be a synthesis, supply corrections, additions and new insights into early Indochina and its Indianization.
The first part turns to the tradition of Funan’s Indianization by the Brahmin Kauṇḍinya, as reported in the third century by the envoy K’ang T’ai (Kang Tai). Through a quotation preserved in the T’ai p’ing yu lan (Taiping yulan) (983), Pelliot reconstructs a version closer to the lost original than the later dynastic histories: a devotee, Houen‑chen (Kauṇḍinya, actually Hun Tian), receives a divine bow in a dream, finds it at the foot of the “spirit’s tree”, boards a ship that the god drives by the wind to Funan, and finally subdues the local queen Lieou‑ye (Liu Ye). Pelliot offers a fine‑grained discussion of proper names (Lieou‑ye, Mo‑fou, Wou‑wen, etc.), probes their possible etymologies and questions the exact homeland of Kauṇḍinya without attempting a dogmatic conclusion. He fully acknowledges the legendary nature of some motifs, yet defends the historical value of the underlying memory preserved in these traditions.
A second set of fragments concerns kingdoms and islands of Southeast Asia and the Indian Ocean, such as Ko‑ying/Kia‑ying, Yeou‑po and the “island of Kia‑na‑t’iao”, which he identifies with a Kanadvīpa mentioned in a Buddhist sūtra. Pelliot highlights the existence, as early as the third century, of long‑distance maritime trade linking Indo‑Scythian India, the Malay Peninsula, Indochina and, beyond, the Mediterranean “Ta‑ts’in” (Daqin 大秦, ancient Chinese name for the Roman Empire), notably via multi‑masted junks whose routes and carrying capacity he patiently reconstructs.
The article lingers as well on Funan itself: local dugout canoes hewn from single trunks, some twenty meters long, with fish‑shaped prow and stern, crewed by dozens of oarsmen rowing in perfect unison to the rhythm of shouted chants — vessels that Pelliot compares to modern Cambodian racing boats. Another passage evokes gold as a standard medium of exchange and recounts a boatman’s trick played on his passengers, a small anecdote that reveals both economic practices and the maritime imagination of the time.
Drawing on Tang‑period sources and Buddhist commentaries, Pelliot also offers a technical portrait of the “great sea junks”: ships built without nails, sewn together with coconut‑fiber ropes and caulked with resin, whose crews are largely made up of sailors from Island Southeast Asia, known in Chinese sources as “K’ouen‑louen” (Kunlun). He shows how this term — as well as the name of the Khmers — circulates in Chinese literature to designate dark‑skinned peoples of the southern seas, noted for their nautical skills but also wrapped in a folklore of savagery and exoticism.
Through its extraordinary philological rigor, precise phonetic and topographical analysis, and the density of its textual cross‑references, Pelliot’s study remains an indispensable point of entry into Chinese sources on Funan, pre‑Angkorian Indochina and the history of navigation across the Indian Ocean. The Hachette–BnF reprint now makes it easier to consult this still‑authoritative essay and to appreciate how deeply it has shaped the historiography of Southeast Asia.
Buy the reprint on bookshop.org.
